Has anyone ever pondered this thought? (Possibly, but I would imagine not, because it would be considered too politically incorrect and/or homophobic....which I am not.) However, here goes: A man is born with his "parts" and a woman is born with her "parts". Does anyone believe this to be an accident? I don't. I believe each gender is born with those parts because they were meant to work together. And when a person is born a girl and feels she is living in a boy's body and should really be a boy...or visa versa...isn't this considered to be a type of malfunction in the growth of the embryo inside the womb? I believe it is...and I would think most people would agree with that. My questions then is: Why would it be considered anything but appropriate to believe that when a person is born who is attracted to the same sex...that the reason for this is that something malfunctioned in the growth process of the embryo? And as such, then why should the same privileges of marriage be given to people who were born this way?
I do, however, empathize with the plight in life for someone born gay and am all for giving them certain civil rights. But does that mean that they should be given the exact same rights as human beings who arrive in this world as they are genetically intended? Many people think of homosexuals has being the same as heterosexuals, when it's obvious that something went wrong when the embryo was in utero and therefore they are not the same. This does not make me homophobic to believe this way, and I'm not trying to be hurtful or cruel. It's just common sense.
on 11/14/09
Reply